Blast from the past! We stopped updating VisorCentral in late 2002, but feel free to browse around and feel nostalgic. There are 135 reviews and over a thousand articles in our archives. Also check out an even older version of the site.
FrontStoriesProductsGuidesSupportDiscussionMobileAbout      >> Stories >> Commentary
Springboard Modules VS Compact Flash

Sat Nov 6, 1999 - 11:30 PM EST - By Marcus Adolfsson


Disclaimer: As a converted former Windows CE user this opinion story might have a somewhat negative tone towards Windows CE.

Microsoft recently released a "Market Bulletin," in which they compare Springboard technology and Compact Flash.

In the bulletin Microsoft takes a shot at Handspring in several categories. First, Microsoft points out that "Applications like reference guides, dictionaries, and remote controls for audio/video equipment are installable in the system’s memory. None of these examples requires the addition of a module … Using Springboards as application distribution media is more expensive than floppy disks, according to Handspring. These costs are passed on to consumers, and reduce the revenue received by software developers. "

Am I missing something here? I thought software was installable in the system’s memory of the Visor as well. Oh yeah it is. And PalmOS programs are usually much smaller in file size than a comparable Windows CE program. Springboard technology is just another way for users to add software to their Visor.

Multitask >>


Copyright ©1999-2016 Smartphone Experts. All rights reserved : Terms of Use : Privacy Policy
VisorCentral is not not affiliated with or endorsed by Handspring Inc in any way.